Trivo AI Labs

Outcomes

What students and colleges walk away with

Defined skills, a project a student can defend, and records the institution can actually file. Stated plainly, with the limits included.

01For students

For students

  • Practical Python and AI tool skills matched to the track they joined
  • At least one project they can open, run and explain without help
  • A GitHub or portfolio record where the track includes it
  • Practice explaining their work in a short viva-style review
  • Enough vocabulary to discuss AI credibly in interviews and project reviews
  • A completion certificate naming the track and hours actually completed
02For the college

For the college

  • Attendance records and a weekly completion summary
  • A project completion overview suitable for internal and accreditation records
  • A programme structure that can be repeated next semester with minimal planning
  • A named point of contact throughout the cohort
  • Honest reporting, including where results fell short
03Projects

What students actually build

Representative projects for each track. Exact briefs are adapted to the branch and to what the cohort is capable of finishing well.

Track 1

Student marks analyser

A command-line tool that reads a class marks file, calculates averages and highlights students who need support. Teaches file handling, dictionaries and clean function design.

  • Python
  • File I/O
  • Data structures

Track 2

Automated study-notes summariser

A script that takes lecture notes or a PDF and returns a structured summary and question set using an LLM API. Students learn prompt design and how to handle API responses safely.

  • Python
  • LLM API
  • Prompt engineering

Track 3

Department FAQ assistant

A deployed web application that answers questions from a college's own documents using retrieval. Students ship it, share a link and explain every part of the pipeline.

  • RAG
  • Web app
  • Deployment
  • GitHub

Track 4

Multi-agent research assistant

A system where separate agents plan, search, draft and review, coordinating through tool calls and shared memory. Students handle failure cases, not just the happy path.

  • Agents
  • Tool calling
  • Orchestration

Track 5

Workflow automation for a real task

An automation for something the student actually does weekly — attendance collation, report formatting or content drafting — built with no-code AI tools.

  • No-code
  • Automation
  • Prompting

Track 6

Portfolio of four projects

Students complete the progression end to end, finishing with a GitHub profile that shows range: fundamentals, tooling, a deployed app and an agentic system.

  • Full pathway
  • Portfolio
  • GitHub
04Assessment

How progress is assessed

Assessment is designed to show whether a student can do the thing, not whether they attended.

Weekly practice completion

Each week's practice set is checked for completion. This is the earliest signal that a student is falling behind, and it is where we intervene.

Every week

Project increments

The final project is built in stages across the track, so progress is visible throughout rather than only at the end.

Ongoing

Viva-style review

Students walk through their own project and answer questions about the choices they made. Copied work becomes obvious immediately.

Final fortnight

Completion report

The college receives attendance, practice completion and project status per student — reported accurately, including students who did not finish.

End of cohort
Students reviewing code together on a shared computer screen
05Pathway

Student path at a glance

Most colleges run stages one and two in the first semester and stages three and four in the second.

Basics

Python fundamentals, or no-code tools for non-CSE branches

AI tools

Prompting, APIs, workflows and simple automation

Build

A first AI application, deployed and explained

Advance

Optional agentic systems for students ready to go deeper

06Honesty

The limits, stated plainly

A programme is only useful to a college if the claims around it are accurate.

  • We do not guarantee placements or job offers.
  • Outcomes depend on student attendance, effort and prior readiness.
  • We do not claim that every student will become an AI expert in a few weeks.
  • We focus on practical skills and projects that students can actually show.

Students who attend under roughly two thirds of sessions rarely complete a project, whatever the track. We flag this early rather than at the end, so the department can act while it still helps.

Next step

Ready to plan a cohort?

Tell us your student numbers, branches and preferred months. We will send a written proposal with dates, pricing and deliverables — usually within two working days.